Navigation
Homepage Home
Breaking News Breaking News
Aliens and UFOs Aliens and UFOs
The Paranormal The Paranormal
Conspiracy Theories Conspiracy Theories
Entertainment Entertainment
Other Topics Other Topics
Galleries Photo Gallery
Achives Archives Other Topics
Leaderboard Leaderboard Leaderboard
Help and Support Help & Support
Online Now
2 active members (Xeno, Matt), 200 anonymous users, and 11 spiders.
Key: Admin, Head Mod, Mod
Statistics
Forum Directory49
Threads1,598
Posts13,141
Members365
Most Online498
Mar 30th, 2019
Newest Members
ShadowSphere9, dkm919, James, tostr, FuZzCasT
365 Registered Users
Member Spotlight
rudidur
rudidur
46° 03´ 30.16" S 14°30´ 09.07" V
Posts: 55
Joined: March 2018
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Xeno 635
Music 230
Zoa 63
EdMan 26
Shark 21
rudidur 20
Top Posters(All Time)
Xeno 3,877
EdMan 1,353
Music 948
George 345
Shark 310
IronGhost 307
Stormy 295
Spock 278
Previous Thread
Next Thread
New Reply
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Can anyone debunk this with actual evidence? #7715
02/27/2019 04:54 PM
02/27/2019 04:54 PM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A




Reply Quote
Advertisement
Re: Can anyone debunk this with actual evidence? [Re: Anonymous] #7716
02/27/2019 04:56 PM
02/27/2019 04:56 PM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A




Reply Quote
Re: Can anyone debunk this with actual evidence? [Re: Anonymous] #7718
02/27/2019 11:49 PM
02/27/2019 11:49 PM
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 345
UK
G
George Offline
Lieutenant Commander
George  Offline
Lieutenant Commander
***
G

Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 345
UK
Originally Posted by Anonymous


YES...I can because I am a mechanical engineer with two degrees in Mechanical Science.

Bull s*** rubbish on YouTube

Of course there is force applied to the tube. Reason being is that a rocket is not closed at one end and has nothing to do with a vacuum cleaner.

The venturous funnelling at the end of the rocket allows gas compression to apply Force 'F' at exponential as mass 'M' decreases during fuel evacuation.
Oxygen is supplied to the rocket fuel as atmospheric oxygen decreases as to allow more heat energy to increase velocity.

Anyone can see that a simple firework rocket can do the same thing. (go out and buy one)
However it can be said that a thrust vortex is created through the rapid expelation of gasses within the tube of a firework rocket because the burning is prolonged by the rotational flow of gunpowder within the sides of the tube.

Going back to the video, it has sod all to do with force on the pipe.

The pipe is connected to the rocket as both gravitation with mass exert opposing forces as in Newtons 3rd Law of Motion.
The resistance being gravitation at 8.11g per m^2 which as the rocket escapes gravitation pull...'G' is decreased allowing 'a' to increase.once in space force 'F' allows the rocket to travel with a small resistance as there is no opposing force 'F' to overcome. Friction decreases as air becomes thinner allowing cooling.

So what the heck is the author on about a small hole in the side????

Common sense tells us that gas would escape and then there would be no force. Why a hole in the side????

Take a straw and try and suck liquid through it with a hole in the side. No liquid will flow which is more or less what the author is saying....but why the extra hole???

The whole emphasis here is that the thrust is pushing on the mass of the rocket. being greater than. gravitation.
Pressure gradient force if you like. The example is rubbish the air at the back of your head is is NOT PUSHING YOU hence the difference
You are in fact apply RESISTANCE by both your own mass hence you feel no air in front of you. If the wind was to propel you forward at an alarming speed, the force of air in front of you would be greater than the air behind. Again...a load of rubbish in the video.

Any idiot could see that if you rode a bicycle the air flow on your face would be greater than the air flow at the back of your head because you are also moving away from the back flow of air by peddling forward. If you were stationary on your bike and the air behind pushed you, it would decrease and you would feel the air resistance on your face BECAUSE YOU ARE MOVING! That word 'MOVING' Not a tube with the hole in it's side
Ia m not impressed by the video because I know more about engineering. I suppose if you know sod all and are impressed by the voice believe what you like.

No evidence as the demo is NOT connected to the rocket and is 'free flowing' Further more the rocket does not NEED to propel in space because their is no longer any air or gravitation Initial velocity 'U' becomes final velocity 'V' as resistance decreases. As in Newton's Third Law of Motion there is no force acting on the nose of the rocket in space so no EQUILIBRIUM allows the rocket to move forward...simple.

Point challenged and debunked


Last edited by George; 02/28/2019 12:19 AM.
Reply Quote
Re: Can anyone debunk this with actual evidence? [Re: Anonymous] #13151
08/02/2019 03:54 PM
08/02/2019 03:54 PM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A



Outer space isnt real, OPQ

Reply Quote
Re: Can anyone debunk this with actual evidence? [Re: Anonymous] #13152
08/02/2019 03:57 PM
08/02/2019 03:57 PM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A



Typo, just meant OP.

An even simpler question is how can the vacuum of space exist next to an atmosphere without a container? It cant...

Earth is flat and unmoving and theres a firmament above us. Check the gravestone of the v2 rocket inventor

http://www-tc.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/assets/img/von-braun/image-06-large.jpg

Reply Quote
Re: Can anyone debunk this with actual evidence? [Re: Anonymous] #13170
08/02/2019 08:01 PM
08/02/2019 08:01 PM
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 187
Oregon
LogicalChaos Offline

UFO Visitors
LogicalChaos  Offline

UFO Visitors
Lieutenant
*****

Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 187
Oregon
Great post George.

My understanding is that rockets carry their own "mass" in the form of rocket fuel (like hydrogen and oxygen), so because of this, a rocket can fly thru space using its own fuel. And the propellant has enough force/mass to propel the rocket inside the vacuum of space. It actually moves faster in space because of the lack of air resistance.

Reply Quote
Re: Can anyone debunk this with actual evidence? [Re: Anonymous] #13217
08/03/2019 04:08 PM
08/03/2019 04:08 PM
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 917
frankieberg1985 Offline

Captain
frankieberg1985  Offline

Captain
*****

Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 917
The video is a little false, it lifts because of the bottom of the box provided resistance, in empty space the rocket`s own mass would provide resistance because of gravity

Reply Quote
Re: Can anyone debunk this with actual evidence? [Re: Anonymous] #13258
08/04/2019 07:07 AM
08/04/2019 07:07 AM

A
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
Anonymous OP
Unregistered
A




!

Reply Quote
Re: Can anyone debunk this with actual evidence? [Re: Anonymous] #13259
08/04/2019 07:33 AM
08/04/2019 07:33 AM

J
Joker OP
Unregistered
Joker OP
Unregistered
J



Originally Posted by Anonymous

!

No! If you're good at something, never do it!

Reply Quote
Quick Reply

Options HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
CAPTCHA Verification



Member Chat
August
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Latest Photos
Sun Disk and Moon Disk Modern!
2 of my most important Artefacts
Milton William "Bill" Cooper
Former CIA Pilot, John Lear
School Picture of Georgek
Stop Chemtrails!!
UBB.Pages
AREA 51 ACCESS MEMBERSHIP
Test Page



Thanks for visiting the Aliendisc Forums
(v 2.2.4.5, Build 7.7.1) · Patch Notes


Your #1 UFO Forum, Paranormal Forum, and
Conspiracy Theory Forum Destination.

Security and Privacy Info

CAREERS | ABOUT | SUPPORT | PRESS

© 2019 ALIENDISC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
All trademarks referenced herein are the properties of their respective owners.